DOJ rebuffs judge’s demand to state “anti-weaponization” fund is dead

The Trump administration has refused to submit a court declaration from Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which would confirm that a controversial $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund is not proceeding. This decision came after U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema requested the declaration to prevent further litigation. The judge had previously issued a preliminary injunction to block the Justice Department from creating or operating the program. Despite the administration’s assurances that the fund is not moving forward, the refusal to provide a sworn statement has left the lawsuit, filed by a coalition including two nonprofits and a former federal prosecutor, unresolved. Senior Justice Department lawyers argue that the declaration is unnecessary and raises separation of powers concerns. However, the plaintiffs, represented by Democracy Forward, criticize the administration for not confirming under oath that the fund is defunct. The situation remains tense as the court considers whether to dismiss the case based on the administration’s verbal assurances. QUESTION: How might the refusal to provide a sworn declaration impact public trust in government transparency and accountability?