Kyle Lam and his co-authors have developed a framework to classify medical artificial intelligence (AI) based on autonomy, automation, and operational scope. This framework is intended to help set regulatory and liability boundaries for different levels of AI capabilities. While the authors mention the importance of informed consent, their focus is primarily on assigning responsibility to clinicians, healthcare organizations, device manufacturers, and regulators. Unfortunately, the framework does not systematically address patient rights, which is a significant oversight. This article highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach that includes patient rights in the design of AI systems in healthcare.
QUESTION: How might the exclusion of patient rights in AI frameworks impact the trust and effectiveness of healthcare systems?
