CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains why Lindsay Clancy’s attorney is questioning the timing of a potential new trial regarding the tragic case of Clancy, who is accused of killing her three children. The attorney’s decision to raise doubts about whether Clancy committed the killings is likely a strategic move to influence the trial’s outcome. By questioning the timing, the defense may aim to introduce new evidence or arguments that could impact the jury’s perception of Clancy’s mental state at the time of the incident. This approach could be crucial in determining whether Clancy is found guilty or if her actions are seen as a result of mental illness. The case highlights the complexities of legal strategies in high-profile trials and the importance of understanding the defendant’s mental health in criminal proceedings.
QUESTION: How might understanding mental health issues change the way society views criminal responsibility?
Why Lindsay Clancy’s attorney is only now questioning whether she committed killings
